DreamHost Shared Starter vs GitHub Pages
A detailed comparison to help you choose between DreamHost Shared Starter and GitHub Pages.
DreamHost Shared Starter Affordable shared hosting for small sites and blogs | GitHub Pages Free static site hosting directly from your GitHub repository | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.5 (237 reviews)✓ | 4.2 (11 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | free |
| Best for | First-time site owners and small bloggers who need a simple, low-cost entry point into web hosting without performance-critical requirements. | Developers and technical teams building documentation sites, project portfolios, and blogs who already use GitHub. |
| Pricing transparency | ||
| Intro price | $2.59/mo | $0.00/mo✓ |
| Renewal price | $7.99/mo | $0.00/mo✓ |
| Renewal hike | +209% | — |
| Renewal transparency | good | good |
| Money-back days | 97 days✓ | 0 days |
| Uptime guarantee | 99.9% | 99.99%✓ |
| Hosting amenities | ||
| cPanel included | ||
| WordPress 1-click | ✓ | |
| Staging environment | ||
| Daily backups | ||
| Free SSL | ||
| Free domain | ✓ | |
| Free migration | ||
| Phone support | ||
| Live chat | ✓ | |
| LiteSpeed server | ||
| Green hosting | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | United States | United States |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free domainfree sslgreen hostingwordpress optimised1 click installer | free tierfree ssl |
| Visit DreamHost Shared Starter → | Visit GitHub Pages → | |
DreamHost Shared Starter
Pros
- + Enable unlimited bandwidth and storage at entry-level pricing
- + Include free domain registration and SSL certificate
- + Support WordPress with automatic installation and updates
- + Access 24/7 customer support via multiple channels
Cons
- - Shared resources mean performance depends on neighboring sites' traffic
- - Limited to one website on the Starter tier
- - No dedicated IP address included
GitHub Pages
Pros
- + Deploy instantly by pushing to GitHub—no separate hosting account needed
- + HTTPS included by default with automatic certificate renewal
- + Integrated version control and deployment history built into Git
- + Jekyll preprocessing allows dynamic templates and plugins for static generation
Cons
- - Limited to static content—no server-side code execution or databases
- - Build times can delay deployments for large sites with complex Jekyll setups
- - Fewer customization options than traditional hosting providers
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best web hosts, renewal-pricing alerts, and deal drops.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.