Purelymail vs SmarterASP.NET
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Purelymail and SmarterASP.NET.
Purelymail Simple, privacy-focused email hosting without the bloat | SmarterASP.NET Managed ASP.NET hosting with SQL Server and Windows support | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.6 (307 reviews) | 4.8 (158 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Best for | Developers, small business owners, and privacy-conscious users who need reliable custom domain email without enterprise overhead. | Teams building ASP.NET applications who want managed hosting with SQL Server integration and Visual Studio integration without managing infrastructure directly. |
| Pricing transparency | ||
| Intro price | $0.83/mo✓ | $3.29/mo |
| Renewal price | $0.83/mo✓ | $5.29/mo |
| Renewal hike | +0%✓ | +61% |
| Renewal transparency | good | good |
| Money-back days | 0 days | 60 days✓ |
| Uptime guarantee | 99.9% | 99.9% |
| Hosting amenities | ||
| cPanel included | ||
| WordPress 1-click | ||
| Staging environment | ||
| Daily backups | ✓ | |
| Free SSL | ||
| Free domain | ||
| Free migration | ||
| Phone support | ||
| Live chat | ✓ | |
| LiteSpeed server | ||
| Green hosting | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | United States | United StatesNetherlands |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free ssl | free ssldaily backups |
| Visit Purelymail → | Visit SmarterASP.NET → | |
Purelymail
Pros
- + Configure unlimited email forwards and catch-all addresses per domain
- + Access full IMAP and SMTP without restrictions or throttling
- + Set up SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records for email authentication
- + Maintain complete privacy—no tracking or data sales
Cons
- - Smaller support team and community compared to established providers
- - No built-in webmail interface; requires external client or forwarding setup
- - Limited integrations with third-party apps or services
SmarterASP.NET
Pros
- + Deploy directly from Visual Studio with One-Click publishing
- + Includes SQL Server databases with automated backups
- + Support for ASP.NET Framework, .NET Core, and legacy applications
- + Multiple US data center locations for redundancy
- + Transparent pricing with no hidden setup fees
Cons
- - Windows hosting typically costs more than Linux alternatives
- - Limited serverless or containerization options compared to cloud platforms
- - Regional availability primarily in United States
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best web hosts, renewal-pricing alerts, and deal drops.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.